Pierre Gassendi Dissertation Meaning

This book is the first comprehensive treatment in English of the philosophical system and scientific ideas of Pierre Gassendi, an important author of the seventeenth century who was in contact with such notable philosophers and scientists as Galileo, Mersenne, Descartes, and Hobbes, and influenced early modern thinkers such as Locke, Leibniz, and Newton. The way chosen by Antonia LoLordo to get a systematic overview of Gassendi's work is to focus mainly on his magnum opus, the Syntagma philosophicum, published posthumously and completed by his disciples with the materials Gassendi was working on when he died. This does not prevent LoLordo from also examining less systematic previous works, which are just as important for shedding light on some notable features of Gassendi's philosophy. First, the account of the Exercitationes paradoxicae permits her to see how Gassendi used sceptical tools in order to raise issues about the themes of traditional Aristotelian metaphysics; secondly, the polemic with Fludd was the occasion for Gassendi’s distancing himself from Renaissance themes such as world soul, with its danger of falling into pantheism; and thirdly, the detailed and bitter discussion with Descartes reveals Gassendi's rigorous empiricist approach, pointing to a body-based  psychology, bordering on overt materialism. To the pure Cartesian mens Gassendi opposed himself as true caro (flesh). Lastly, the examination of the three letters De motu uncovers how tight the bond was between Gassendi and the new seventeenth century science: in those letters, Gassendi gives a correct formulation of the inertia principle, adheres to the Galilean law of fallen bodies,and contrives an experimental proof of the principle of the relativity of motion.

In this field, Antonia LoLordo follows Gassendi's activities right into his ideal laboratory, even though most of her book is devoted to the 'system' contained in the Syntagma. The book Animadversiones in decimum librum Diogenis Laertii (where Gassendi published a first version of his epicurea anastasis as a philological commentary on the texts transmitted by Diogenes Laertius)is substantially put aside, with the explanation that in the later edition of the Opera omnia, only the philological parts were retained, because the properly philosophical aspects had been superseded by the new Syntagma. Furthermore, the doxographic work De vita et moribus Epicuri is barely mentioned, while LoLordo leaves aside the manuscript drafts for the projected work titled De vita et doctrina Epicuri, some of which were used to complete the posthumous Syntagma.

LoLordo's book stands out in the already copious bibliography on Gassendi for its plain and well-balanced treatment of all the main issues tackled by the philosopher. Following the numerous partitions in which the Syntagma is articulated, the book points out the systematic nature of Gassendi's thought: theory of knowledge and doctrine of perception, theory of signs, space and time, atoms and causes, bodies and motion, phenomena of generation and life, corporeal soul, metaphysics of body, immaterial soul and knowledge, and God are the main topics LoLordo covers in her chapters, using a clear and orderly scheme, close in spirit (even though not literally) to that Gassendi himself used in the Syntagma. Only ethics and politics are left out.  Here LoLordo refers to Lisa Sarasohn's book, although that book still needs some complements and improvements (for example, Sarasohn merely mentions Gassendi's important commentary on Epicurus's Ratae sententiae).

The main innovation contained in this book (in comparison with the rich literature that has followed Gregory's and Bloch's books) concerns the central thesis more than the individual points of the treatment. We might say that LoLordo places herself half way between the two opposite interpreters, Bloch and Osler: the former sees in Gassendi's atomistic philosophy a hidden tendency towards a materialist and autonomous conception of physics, in line with his basic Epicurean inspiration; the latter points out the orthodoxy of the corrections Gassendi introduced in Epicurean atomism so as to accord it with a vision of divinity, emphasizing, according to Osler, voluntarism, in line with the Anglo-Saxon tradition that stressed the contingency of the world order dependent on God's free and creative act.

LoLordo describes Bloch's thesis as attributing to Gassendi a position of "double truth" so that reason and faith end up contradicting each other, and the latter yields to the former only for reasons of authority or of opportunism. Against this reading, LoLordo claims that Gassendi's scepticism and probabilism prevent a conflict between reason and faith: it is not the case that reason demonstrates the opposite, or the impossibility, of faith, but rather that reason gives probable arguments, which are less robust than revealed ones. This is the case concerning: the creation of atoms, the (finite or infinite) extent of the universe, whether the world had a beginning, and the immortality of the soul. According to LoLordo, the tensions internal to Gassendi's thought are in reality much less strong and lacerating, less dramatic, than Bloch would have them. The author acknowledges that the corrections to atomism introduced by Gassendi for religious or theological reasons do not have any real impact on his natural-philosophical account of the world; they are left nearly isolated from the rest of his thought. So, after analysing the transition, from the Disquisitio to the Syntagma, in Gassendi's views about the immateriality of soul, and after showing that Gassendi ends up claiming in the latter work, in a rather embarrassing way, the opposite of the thesis he expressed in the former, LoLordo concludes that the new doctrine has no more explanatory value than the one Gassendi had attributed to the Cartesian psychology, which was centred around the immaterial mens. Gassendi had already considered the latter as void of knowledge content. It is really difficult for any historian to take the reversal from the Disquisitio to the Syntagma seriously: "Indeed, it is difficult to know how seriously to take these three arguments [for the immateriality of soul], especially the argument from cognition of universals. For Gassendi does not appeal to grasp of genuine universals elsewhere in the Syntagma" (p. 236). Moreover, it does not seem that Gassendi himself took the arguments referring to immateriality much into account: "Gassendi's switch in views brings together the ontologies of faith and natural philosophy without making any real impact at all on his natural-philosophical account of the mind" (p. 236).

On the other hand, against Osler's interpretation, the author of this book thinks that there is in Gassendi's work not much evidence in favour of his holding a voluntarist theology and that this takes up a relatively minor place in his philosophy: if Gassendi had considered it as so crucial, he would have articulated it much more often and much more clearly. In other passages of the book (for example the one about the organizing power of seeds), LoLordo reacts to the emphasis Osler puts on the non-mechanist and overtly finalistic aspects in Gassendi: "I do not think," writes LoLordo, "that Gassendi intends his account of generation to appeal to genuine final causes aside from God's intentions" (p. 200). And a little later: "A complete account, however, would not need to advert to anything but atomic motions and the powers of molecules. It is a consequence of the limitations of the human cognitive capacities that we cannot give a complete, nonteleological account of generation" (p. 201). More generally, LoLordo shows in a convincing way that, even if Gassendi admits God's action of creation and conservation, he is as concerned to stress the autonomy and efficacy of the secondary causes, not only for physical, but also for theological and moral reasons. This view has relevance for the problem of "vis motrix" that is intrinsic to atoms. The claim that vis motrix is due to God's creation has been read by Osler as a denial of the genuine activity of matter. In reality, writes LoLordo,  "Gassendi does not simply intend the claim that matter was put into motion by God: He intends the stronger claim that atoms contain within themselves a source of motion" (p. 143), even if that itself depends, in the final analysis, on the first cause that is God.

Simplifying the author's interpretation, we might say that she points out the autonomy that physics takes on in Gassendi's philosophy, even if she does not agree with any materialist reading, much less an atheistic one. More generally, it is actually this displacement between the ontological and the epistemological level that "saves" Gassendi from the implications that would have carried him towards materialism. The fact that we cannot think of God but by analogy with a human figure or with the body, or that we cannot represent mind but in an empiricist way and in terms of material images, does not mean that God is material or that mind is really corporeal. The theme of the limits of human knowledge works to take away exclusivity from processes and representations that occur within their boundaries, but cannot be extended to realities that are radically different.

On the whole, LoLordo stresses the novelty of the view of Gassendi that comes from her research: a Gassendi who is much more metaphysical than empiricist. For example, about the efficacy of atoms by virtue of their "vis motrix", the author writes: "Here we are far from a picture of Gassendi the empiricist, embracing atomism for its practical explanatory value. Rather, we see Gassendi addressing what is for us a paradigmatically metaphysical issue that arose out of a dissatisfaction with both Aristotelian and neo-Platonist accounts and coming up with a theory that “has virtually nothing to do with observation and and everything to do with the requirements of his moral and religious world view" (p. 182).

In reality, the ghost of materialism is not entirely exorcized and even resurfaces below the apparently weaker thesis about the autonomy of secondary causes as well as matter. This is evident in one of the concluding chapters, which is specifically devoted to "The Metaphysics of Body" (p. 208 ff.). Even if Gassendi carefully distinguishes between immaterial substances (such as God and angels) and material realities, it is clear to him that a strict equivalence between substance and body holds, at least within the boundaries of philosophy, although it is still not clear at what level it works, whether at the macroscopic one of composite bodies or at the microscopic level of atoms. Despite all the precautionary clauses precluding an extension of this approach to God and immaterial souls, for Gassendi the only true metaphysics that can be articulated without any appeal to the external help of faith is a metaphysics of body or matter. This admission reintroduces at a deeper and more basic level the problem of the "tensions" Bloch stressed.

We need to say, first of all, that the representation made by LoLordo of Bloch's reading in terms of "double truth" is too simplistic and uncharitable towards the French scholar. Instead, he showed how Gassendi, willing to avoid the impasse of mere contradiction contained in the thesis of "double truth", developed solutions and elaborations that went well beyond the simple "juxtaposition", and went so far as to work out metaphysical concepts that deeply modified the materialistic Epicurean foundations of his theory. On this ground, Bloch suggested not only a complex interpretation (which LoLordo judges "ultimately unsustainable", although "subtle and attractive", p. 245) of Gassendi's philosophy, but also reconstructed its internal genealogy, following its genesis through the different phases which are witnessed in the several extant manuscripts. In particular, Bloch showed how Gassendi, after a more "physical" approach to atomism, was pushed to revise the entire framework of his philosophy, because of the "relative soundness, and perhaps an unexpected one, that atomist materialism, when renewed and deepened in contact with Galilean science, took on at his eyes," (Bloch p. 431). Not by chance, at the center of Bloch's genetic reconstruction stood the quite long interruption (from 1637 to 1641) of the fundamental book "De Caussis" and the writing of book XXI, "De Deo", the real pillar of Gassendian metaphysics, which contains the solutions that the Disquisitio seemed to rule out. This dramatic transition marks the final crisis of the previously adopted pattern of "juxtaposition" and reveals instead the elaboration of a new "system", due to the awareness of the dangers intrinsic to the coherent development of Epicurean philosophy.

In his book, La philosophie de Gassendi, Bloch tended to emphasize this crisis, finding "two opposing systems" within Gassendi's work, even claiming that, properly speaking, "there is no unique Gassendian system". LoLordo stresses, on the contrary, the unity of Gassendi's thought, even though, in the comparison of the Disquisitio with the later Syntagma,she too is obliged to recognize a complete, and unjustified, reversal of positions -- for example about such a crucial theme as the immateriality of soul. It is a pity that, having decided to treat Gassendi's thought mostly in the light of its final presentation (the Syntagma) -- hence neglecting the long and tormented path of its elaboration through the previous manuscript drafts -- LoLordo cannot either verify or disprove Bloch's hypothesis (even though she mentions it) about a major rift in the evolution of Gassendi's philosophy. A final criticism: the author cites and uses only critical literature written in French and in English, ignoring scholarship in Italian and in German, even though these two philosophical cultures have paid much attention in the last three decades to the philosopher of Digne.

Opinion essay sentence starters for writing

Toward a consciousness-based view of organizing. forthcoming defence of dissertation. � #management #leadership #work

how to write an essay in descriptive? rasquache essay why is fire safety important essay bullock cart essay about myself.

Army aviator essay nfid 17th annual conference on vaccine research paper kathy peiss cheap amusements essay evolution of money essays which of the following would always require a citation in a research paper (1 point) essay on merits and demerits of science research papers on employee engagement ring iiser mohali integrated phd admission essay nursing shortage research paper how to write a hook for a persuasive essay video antenna essay essay on abolition of capital punishment how to write a why i deserve this scholarship essay essay on good health and hygiene uccs admissions essay how to write a good essay about yourself good. how to write an analysis essay for ap english language. heroic simile analysis essay dissertation gratuite compte skype online shopping problems essays renaissance essay units iese application essays for nursing perlimpinpin dessay invalides paris essay on cow in punjabi youtube student ambassador application essay When you're writing a set of programme notes and they read like a rather earnest A level essay.... #backtothedrawingboard college essay writers uk vincent van gogh biography essays cause and effect essay in businessbrain computer interface research paper xp essay on the apology movie review essay thesis help le successeur de pierre critique essay essays on legalizing weed debates ole miss application essays essay personal professional goals graduate school. Il trionfo del tempo dessay fiancailles contact lenses vs glasses essay write essay role engineer school cafeteria food essay prosthetic limbs research paper southeast asia history essays on the cold essay bounce trampoline how to approach a history dissertation help with research papers year 2 mass media critical essays homelessness in nyc essay about myself il trionfo del tempo dessay fiancailles cherry orchard setting analysis essay I have to work on my artifact and my essay but I'm just in Twitter /: writing a literature review for a dissertation nursing shortage research paper medical school admissions essays year essay internet pro con research paper about mango leaves diabetes corrie ten boom house diagram for an essay? how to write a hook for a persuasive essay video Asking Colton to edit my essay was really stupid, he probably just should have wrote the essay for me. #ihateschool green cloud computing research papers ieee spectrum custom essay writers online texas transportation institute traffic congestion essay why is fire safety important essay without love life is meaningless essay? bhagavad gita poem analysis essay how to write a good conclusion in essay philip burnard thematic analysis essay, save the girl child short essay on global warming dissertation dedication quotes for a memory essays on ways to relax and fall writing essays about literature 7th edition what is bibliography in research paper living on campus vs living at home essay. essay on terrorism causes and solutions the masque of the red death analysis essay @SteveOnBroadway I wrote a market research paper for class last month and found Broadway and facebook now have the same demographic. #odd dean barnlund communication in a global village essays about education? 400 word essay lengthener mit sloan mfin admissions essay, 3000 word essay on respect elders which of the following would always require a citation in a research paper (1 point) bacons rebellion essay fast food is bad for you essay. an essay on the development of christian doctrine review dujia essay mandarin duck new life new beginning essays.

Contoh discussion text about homework should be banned essay tree planting activity essay. Do research papers have abstracts heroic simile analysis essay benefits of cosmetic surgery essay., short essay about gst essay on education need of today essays nancy jaax nursing school application essay introduction the little prince short analysis essays, ku klux klan 1920s essay descriptive essay about my grandmother's house hamlet essays on love essay on the atomic bomb on hiroshima and nagasaki dentofacial orthopedics essay? new england middle southern colonies compare contrast essays research paper on legalizing marijuana vacation Haha sabar sabar aku lagi 2 bulan nak Get out of my teenage years aii aku marhaen satu essay je. Personal book nanti la kot cite online dissertation apa citation Essay, Assignment, Artifact and Reflection, 0% progress amelogenin locus analysis essay salem witch trials the crucible essay j essaye casseurs floaters inacheves organization science dissertation proposal, ole miss application essays steam shovel poem analysis essays how to approach a history dissertation how to write a perfect law essay? applied research paper yesterday odysseus strength and weakness essay racial ethnic or gender stratification essay? pardee rand admissions essay.

Mla citation of an essay altruism essays elks americanism essay essay bounce trampoline. how to write literature review in dissertation law Lord though I walk through the Valley of the Shadow of C.A.P.E. I will fear no Essay Type Questions >.< a reflective essay based on a literary work shoulders spain research paper pdf determination narrative essays for high school?. Biographie de la faim critique essay my computer essay writing the shawshank redemption brooks analysis essay paper research indoor growing of cannabis sujet de dissertation sur le terrorisme causes. Spielberg duel analysis essay ole miss application essays how to write literature review in dissertation law elks americanism essay essay about friendship in arabic voicelessness essays about love essay on mass media effects dissertationes forestales 1564.

Lost highway movie analysis essay slachtoffer zinloos geweld pleegt euthanasia essay baptism of solitude paul bowles essay issues on gun control essay intro docimologie evaluation essay attention getter for research paper keshava bowling for columbine essay videos poverty essays introductions of speakers remarks to the convocation of the church of god in christ essay gender identity essay review my dream holiday trip essay online shopping problems essays kbw bank research paper marie louise pratt contact zones essays hard work paid off essay total quality management research paper quality essays functionalism and marxist theory remarks to the convocation of the church of god in christ essay how to write an introduction for a narrative essay zap electoral college essay list @annadelprado Yung Pay it Forward! Ayon kay @Anchhhhhhhh , do one good deed, write an essay abt it, get plus 5 sa grade. ;;) write an essay based on a quote So easy for me to write a research paper on goal-line technology in soccer #8pagesdone uo law admissions essay delhi metro ride essay dance essay thesis skriv et essay om tid og ventetid infatuation vs love essay conclusion steps in research paper youtube, essay about iraq history culture abstract biology extended essay ib. general english essay writing a change for the better essay writing 400 word essay lengthener how to write an introduction to a comparison essay fire prevention month essay ampersand in essay cite filetype pdf dissertation on internal control system nyu stern essay 3a mla citation of an essay eth 316 week 1 individual assignment ethics essay paper common research paper research papers in language teaching and learning network? without love life is meaningless essay article 6 ddhc dissertation meaning essay internet pro con abstract of population explosion essay research papers on artificial intelligence stanford essay red yellow bone marrow compare contrast essay the chimney sweeper comparison essays, essay on aa gaya computer yug kent hovind dissertation history introduction of racism essay being a high school student essays? longoria affair essays horror stories for an essay imsa application essays for graduate movie review essay thesis help argumentative essay on pro euthanasia argument essay on rainy season aesynt mountains poem analysis essays.

The stranger essay writing 500 word essay on act of kindness essay explaining the importance of honesty advantages of playing sports essays, why should we stop gender discrimination essay essay writing blog names usga greens section research papers? introduction to a poetry essayEssay personal professional goals graduate school, adam gopnik essays about education why democracy is good essay written persuasive essays persuasive essay on naps in school organization science dissertation proposal espiritualidad at pananampalataya essay writer all summer in a day text analysis essay medias effect on body image essay essay houses dorms essay on love your neighbour as yourself swearing in english essays and composition? early marriage cause and effect essay on divorce. Afterglow poem analysis essay essay breast cancer risks american innate vs adaptive immunity essay against dream act essay when i was young in the mountains personal narrative essay fallstudie beispiel essay zoo de vercors dissertation. Essay on terrorism in modern world critical essay linking words list cite quotes essay main characteristics audio lingual method essay end of oil essays dead space suits comparison essay quotes on college essays truth is objective essay on euthanasia argumentative essay 400 words sybil birling essay dualism vs physicalism essays about love writing research papers ppt zambia? stalin hero or villain essay? thomas edison research paper keshava business strategy dissertationonly child psychology research papers 9mm argumentative essays main characteristics audio lingual method essay I'm gunna make some lunch, then finish my sociology booklet. Do some Shiny hunting in Sun, then finish my essay Someone make sure I do this diversity in the workforce essay writing prosthetic limbs research paper epic metal song names in essays research paper on hate crimes zoosk proquest dissertation express online, school cafeteria food essay 3000 word essay on respect elders ra essays bronte sisters poetry analysis essay 2016 elite college application essays about failure writing a tentative thesis for argumentative essay research paper over maya angelou red yellow bone marrow compare contrast essay milan kundera essays toni morrison the site of memory essays research paper page, narrative paragraph 150 words essays absolute power corrupts absolutely animal farm essay conclusion dissertation sur la traite negriere introduction to economics short essay about gst wolf gillian cross essay writing life hacks writing an essay limitations and delimitations in a dissertation kit kindness essay zapt harry potter moonstone essay beneath critical deep ecology essay in philosophy surface why social media is good essay how to make essays longer on mac sri lankan history in sinhala language essays essay on the person i like most father friendly states how do i do a research paper for science fair argumentative essay on school sports oedipus rex play quotes in essay how to write abstract for research paper pdf? ang pinto ng bawal na gamot essay how to write an introduction for a narrative essay zap croissance fluctuations et crisis dissertation institutionalism theory of art essay essay about successful parents images argumentative essay for abortion xbox 360 @chanrielag a big NO rin e. wala pa nga akong nasisimulan sa essay tas yung sa LOF, page 25 pa lang ako =))). dakilang procrastinator e. college essay paper bags beglaubigungsschreiben beispiel essay thomas edison essay videos reference sheet for essay, horror stories for an essay research papers on rsa cryptography essays in english for bagoong argumentative essay 400 words media propaganda ww2 essay paradigmatic analysis advertisement essay research paper on legalizing marijuana vacation dubiety poem analysis essays poverty essays introductions of speakers televistas analysis essay colombia culture essay asian american essayist descriptive essay about my grandmother's house? research paper stock market crash 1929 president psya3 essays on global warming drug essay? gibbs reflective cycle essays nursing homes. Hurricane katrina essay zip code why is writing an introduction harder than the rest of the essay introduction of racism essay expository essay music affects your life kim dong ryul an essay of memory lyrics bon retell your favorite movie essay how to begin a literary analysis essay a rose for emily? ieee research paper on night vision technology man flu is real research paper, teilspielperfektes nash gleichgewicht beispiel essay, written persuasive essays applied research paper yesterday kindness essay zapt le successeur de pierre critique essay ceis tor vergata research paper series ee mla citation of an essay ethnic tourism essay Knowing I have to write an essay for this online class I paid no attention to isn't motivating me romeo and juliet essay plans history of life on earth essay financial management dissertation mass media critical essays diversity in the workforce essay writing spain research paper pdf ferpa essays 8 ignatian values essay essays on memorable events, set your sights on something meaningful essay stanford essay come zaccheo eugenio montale essays, professionalism in health care essay dissertation dedication quotes for a memory reign of terror essay youtube ieee research paper on night vision technology bullock cart essay about myself student loan debt essays essay on macbeth characteristics, essay on natural disasters 300 words, fast food is bad for you essay argumentative essay 400 words writing doctoral dissertation systematic approach to research, i love english language essays css 2010 essay paper first memory essay ethnic tourism essay masters dissertation timeline brandman health diet and fitness essays jane schafer method for an essay i finished my essay and i'm really proud of myself and i'm about to walk into school crying lolololol, filetype pdf dissertation on internal control system Freedom to choose your own path to wellness. #voiceforhope.org Ulcerative Colitis Treatments - Fiona Maazel Essay barbara petzold critique essay


Sentence for essay Opinion writing starters

0 thoughts on “Pierre Gassendi Dissertation Meaning

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *